With sentence no. 2311/14, issued on 17 February 2014 in case no. 37937/11, the Milan IP Court (Judges Mrs. Tavassi, Mr. Perrotti and Mrs. Gandolfi) decided in favour of Cassina S.p.a. in proceedings on copyright infringement and unfair competition commenced by Cassina against High Tech s.r.l. The subject matter of the dispute related to the copies of the works by Le Corbusier known as LC1, LC2 and LC4, marketed by High Tech in the absence of any authorisation by Cassina, i.e. the exclusive copyright holder.

With a recent decision (Judgment no. 1143/2014 ) concerning the jurisdiction of the Italian courts with respect to non-Italian fractions of European patents, the IP Court of Milan seems to depart from the position expressed by the Supreme Court in its late 2013 reversal on the so-called Italian Torpedo

In Italy’s IP courts, an alleged infringer can seek an interim declaratory judgment within the framework of summary, fast-track proceedings, in order to swiftly prevent or stop the hostile use of a patent by a competitor.

By order of 21 February 2014, the IP court of Milan, judge Ms. Giani, dealt with the copyright protection of literary books, retracing the key principles of the relevant copyright legislation.

For the second consecutive year, Silhouette, the world leading premium rimless eyewear company based in Austria, assisted by our law firm, successfully enforced its IP rights at the International Optics MIDO Fair which took place in Milan from 1 to 3 March.

A few weeks after the Florence Courts of Assizes, in yet another twist in a legal case that’s been going on for seven years, found Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito guilty of the murder of Meredith Kercher, another ruling on the same case was filed in Milan, well away from the spotlight.

The Italian Supreme Court of Cassation, through sentence n. 1608 of the 27th of January ’14, which confirmed the decision of the first instance Court of Bolzano based on article 152 of the Privacy Code, offered a new important ruling about journalism, privacy and the possibility of identifying the parties involved.

On 3 February 2014, the Italian Court of Cassation disclosed the reasons adduced in the sentence issued on 18 December 2014, in which the Court eventually acquitted three of Google’s managers who were initially accused and charged by the Milan Court of First Instance with six months in prison (judgment no. 1972 of 4 February 2010) for uploading a video where a disabled child was bullied by his classmates and sharing it via the website www.video.google.it.

Callegari Martini Manna has been ranked in the 2014 edition of the independent directory “World Trademark Review 1000: The World’s Leading Trademark Professionals“, which was published today.  In addition, the firm’s partner Elena Martini has been singled out again as a leading professional in the field, ranked for the second consecutive year in the category “Individuals: enforcement & litigation“.

Ex parte descriptions follow their own special rules and are quite unique among provisional measures available under Italian IP laws. This has been confirmed in a recent decision made by the IP Court of Milan (order of 12/28/2013, Docket no. 71667/2013).

In recent years a large number of patent infringement proceedings have started between originator pharmaceutical companies manufacturing patented drugs, and companies commercialising the corresponding generic medicinal products.

Following a lawsuit between two companies specializing in the publication of judicial foreclosures, the IP Court of Rome, on appeal, upheld a first instance preliminary injunction based on the sui generis right granted by copyright laws to the maker of a database in order to protect its investments (IP Court of Rome, docket no. 65124/2013, order of 24 December 2013).

With resolution no. 680/13/CONS of 12 December 2013, the Italian Communications Authority (ICA) unanimously adopted the final text of its Regulation concerning copyright protection on electronic communication networks” (hereafter the Regulation), aimed at opposing the spread of copyright infringement both on the web and within audiovisual media services under Legislative Decree no. 177/2005.

The Brescia IP court recently issued two interim decisions on descriptive fair use of a trademark by the reseller of genuine goods.

Much has been written on Italy’s IP courts jurisdiction over IP rights infringements involving so-called “Information Society” technologies. However, a recent order of the Milan IP Court (docket no. 29942/2013), that has gone apparently unnoticed by legal commentators, tackles the subject with regard to some of the most current issues, namely apps for mobile devices and social networks; also notably, the social network provider implicated, for once, was not the intermediary, but the alleged direct infringer.

In the Italian legal system, an industrial product can enjoy cumulative protection under design, copyright, unfair competition, trademark, and even patent laws.

By decision no. 14508/13 of last 10 June, the Italian Supreme Court upheld jurisdiction of the Italian courts in the so called “Italian torpedoes”, i.e. cross-border proceedings for the declaration of non-infringement (“DNI”) of non-Italian portions of European patents.

With decision of last 3 October in case C-170/12, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) ruled on jurisdiction in a copyright infringement case.

On August 25, the new Regulation (EU) no. 611/2013 on the measures applicable to the notification of personal data breaches imposed on Internet providers and telephone companies under article 4 of the e-Privacy directive 2002/58/Ce, as amended by directive 2009/136/Ce (respectively the “Regulation” and the “Directive”), came into force. Pursuant to said article 4, in particular, providers of publicly available electronic communications services (“Providers”) are obliged to notify the competent national protection data authorities (“DPAs”), and in certain cases also the subscribers and other individuals concerned, of possible personal data breaches.